Proof

Real outcomes, current signal.

The proof is strongest when past outcomes and present systems point in the same direction. Commercial results, workflow redesign, and current build lanes all matter here.

Numbers people ask for first

The useful metric is the one that still means something after the meeting.

$6.8M net-new ARR generated at Atlassian
27% of total team output in that motion
22% faster time-to-value through onboarding redesign
40% less repeated validation work through tooling

Commercial and customer outcomes

  • managed a EUR1.5M ARR portfolio across 40+ enterprise accounts
  • ranked as a top contributor in growth motions at Atlassian
  • improved onboarding, adoption, and churn visibility through better systems

Current systems proof

  • Master OS is a live operating model, not a slide deck
  • BrowserOS and career lanes show repeatable workflow design
  • Smaller automation work proves the taste for useful constraints

How I work

I do best in environments where architecture still has to survive contact with real operations.

Working style

Builder-heavy

Meetings should support motion. They should not replace it.

Problem fit

Ambiguity to structure

I like turning scattered pressure into a design people can actually run.

Automation posture

Guarded by design

AI helps inside a governed workflow. Judgment stays with the operator.